Skip to content Need urgent help?
Research

Research position

We have run no studies and published no papers. This page sets out what we would like to study, what we would need before starting, and the rules we would hold ourselves to.

The state of our research today

Stated plainly, so nothing here can be mistaken for work already done.

  • Studies running None No trial, cohort or survey is recruiting, and none has been registered.
  • Papers published None Nothing has been submitted to a journal, a preprint server or a conference.
  • Institutional agreements None No university, hospital or research council has agreed to work with us.
  • Ethics approvals None No protocol has been submitted to an ethics committee, because no protocol exists yet.

What we would like to study

Four questions we think are worth answering. They are priorities, not protocols — nothing below has a design, a site or a partner attached to it.

collaborations.study_1_title

collaborations.study_1_desc

collaborations.study_2_title

collaborations.study_2_desc

collaborations.study_3_title

collaborations.study_3_desc

collaborations.study_4_title

collaborations.study_4_desc

Rules we would hold ourselves to

We have published nothing, so these are commitments rather than a record. Hold us to them.

A protocol before any data is touched

Question, method and analysis plan written down and registered first, so a disappointing result cannot quietly become a different study.

Consent that is asked for, not assumed

No one's data enters a study because they used the app. Participation would be opt-in, separately explained, and withdrawable without losing access to anything.

Ethics review by someone who is not us

An independent ethics committee, through an institutional partner, before recruitment — not a self-assessment.

Publish the result either way

Including null and unflattering findings. A company that only publishes what suits it is doing marketing, not research.

No claim that outruns the evidence

Our health content already carries the line 'independent clinical review in progress' rather than claiming a review it has not had. Research claims will be held to the same standard.

What we could and could not bring to a study

Useful to know early, so nobody plans around something that does not exist.

  • collaborations.research_metric_1_label
  • collaborations.research_metric_2_label
  • collaborations.research_metric_3_label

If this is your field, we would like to hear from you

We are looking for a principal investigator and an institution willing to shape a first question with us. We would rather start small and finish it than announce something large.